RETROREVIEWS

Sci-Fi/Fantasy

Home
New Releases
News!
Film Of The Month
Comedy
Action/Thrillers
Animation
Sci-Fi/Fantasy
Drama/Documentary
Westerns
Horror
Indie/Cult Films
Musicals
World Cinema
Kings Of Comedy
The Tim Burton Page
Oscars/ Awards
Film Premieres
Best Scenes
Film Scripts
Top Tenz
Books/Adaptations
Music/Soundtrax
Song Lyrics
Video Games
Film Mistakes
Actors/Directors/Writers
Pull The Strings
Buddies Page
Anime/ Mangas
Contact Me
Answers
Linx!
Other Stuff...

This is the place where Cablo Gula writes film reviews for science-fiction or fantasy films. Enjoy!
 
What's new?: X-Men, Batman and Robin reviews
 

 

Total Recall (1990)

 

With: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Rachel Ticotin, Sharon Stone, Michael Ironside

 

 

Paul Verhoeven, director of such inventive and hugely entertaining sci-fi films as Robocop, Starship Troopers and Hollow Man had one of his best moments when he directed this clever, action-packed sci-fi flick. Based on a short story by genius science-fiction writer Philip K. Dick (Blade Runner, Minority Report), Total Recall is a twists-filled story set in 2084. Big Achnold is Douglas Quaid, a construction worker who, one day, decides to go to Recall (an agency where they implant artificial ‘holidays’ in your mind) in order to get memories of a 2 week incredible adventure on Mars implanted. Obviously, something goes wrong and Quaid starts being pursued by numerous bad guys and everyone he knew and loved turns out to be in on the conspiracy. He makes his way to Mars, where he learns that he has already been there (and not only in his dreams, wink) and that he is in fact a secret agent whose purpose is to bring down the evil tyrant in control of the Red Planet...or is it? In short, we get a film packed with action, one-liners, mutants, special-effects and numerous twists. What more could you ask for? The effects were very impressive at the time and most of them still look pretty good today. As for Arnold, well, he does his best in a film that’s probably too clever for his usual robotic persona. His one-liners are as good as ever though: ‘screw you!’, ‘consider that a divoarce’, ‘get your ass to Mars’, ‘You’re not youah, you are meah!’ (lol). The rest of the cast is brilliantly over-the-top and quite impressive. Overall, this is a film that still manages to mess with your mind every time you watch it. It’s very entertaining, terrific fun and is definitely one of Arnie’s best.

 

Overall: ****/5

 

Batman Forever (1997)

 

With: Val Kilmer, Jim Carrey, Chris O’Donnell, Tommy Lee Jones, Nicole Kidman

 

 

 

When the opening titles for Forever begin, it’s instantly obvious that Tim Burton’s dark and gothic style will not be attending the bat-reunion. Instead, it appears director Joel Schumacher has decided to bring the dark knight of Gotham into another direction. Val Kilmer takes over the role of Batman from Michael Keaton, who wasn’t too impressed with the script. Batman Forever is a more sci-fi-ish and campy version of the Batman story and it’s closer to the old TV series with Adam West than the Tim Burton films. Gotham City itself is a different city than the film-noir Gotham of the first film or the gothic, snowy one from Returns. In Forever, Gotham is a futuristic city filled with goofy thugs, colourful parties and fluorescent lights. The first villain we encounter is Two-Face, an ex-honest-lawyer turned psychotic schizophrenic criminal after Batman failed to protect him from being disfigured on one side of his face by a crime boss. Two-Face (aka Harvey Dent) is played by Tommy Lee Jones, who surprisingly gives the most demented performance of his career. Sadly, this effort is a bit stained by the fact that Two-Face is not supposed to be a giggling, Joker-like character. The other villain is Jim Carrey’s eccentric, insane and campy Riddler (aka Edward Nygma), a scientist with an obsession with his idol Bruce Wayne. When he gets fired by the latter, he snaps and becomes a criminal seeking revenge from the man who rejected his invention and ‘cruelly’ fired him. He therefore starts writing riddles and sending them to Wayne whilst forming a secret alliance with Two-Face. He promises the latter that if he helps him make his Box invention grow he will manage to reveal to him who Batman is and eventually destroy him. The Bat has undergone numerous changes too, not only does he have a new batmobile, a bat-suit with rubber nipples and some new gadgets, but he is confused about numerous things: Nicole Kidman’s femme-fatale Dr Chase doesn’t know if she wants Batman or Bruce, and Bruce has to take care of a young, troubled and angry orphan called Dick Grayson (aka Robin), whose parents were killed by Two-Face. Overall, Batman Forever is vastly inferior to Tim Burton’s previous Bat-films: the story is preposterous, the whole thing is overly silly, colourful and light-hearted and the characters aren’t believable. Having said that, it has some redeeming elements: Robin’s entrance is well done, Bruce Wayne’s dark side and troubled past remains, The Riddler is terrifically unhinged and it’s all very entertaining. No masterpiece, but great fun nevertheless.

 

Overall: ***/5

 

Batman & Robin (1997)

 

With: George Clooney, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Chris O’Donnell, Uma Thurman, Alicia Silverstone

 

 

 

When Tim Burton left the Batman franchise it was obvious things would never be the same for the Dark Knight. After the hit success of the first Batman and its superior sequel Batman Returns, the only way to go was down. And as much fun as Batman Forever was, it was no match for its predecessors and marked the first sign of the Bat’s decline. Then, with the fair if wooden Val Kilmer giving the Batsuit to tanned ER doctor George Clooney and Tim Burton leaving the picture altogether (even on the producing side), Joel Schumacher was finally free to do whatever he wanted, I guess the destruction of Batman was at the top of his list. Whoever said The Joker was Batman’s greatest foe clearly underestimated the power of The Schumacher! With the ever-unreliable Arnie cast as the cold-hearted Mr Freeze and the sexy Uma Thurman given the task of bringing Poison Ivy to life, things were ready to go. Oh yes, and Alicia Silverstone (Clueless) appears as Batgirl. The story is absolutely preposterous (the Batman Forever story seems practically plausible next to this one) but it deserves a run through nevertheless. There’s a new villain in Gotham City: apparently he needs to steal big diamonds in order to create enough power of some sort to keep his beloved wife alive until he can find a cure for her illness…McGregor’s disease (whatever that is!). Freeze, in case you were unaware of this, has the ability to, well, freeze anything in his path with a rather large and silly-looking gun which, I’m still convinced is made of empty toilet rolls, shiny wrapping paper, sparkles and tin foil. Meanwhile, an eccentric scientist with a green thumb (not literally) is murdered by her lunatic megalomaniac boss and becomes the evil, deadly temptress Poison Ivy, whose goal is to reduce everyone to shreds in order to avenge “Mother Nature” and restart a world with weird…plant…monster thingies instead of people. For this, she soon pairs up with the Frosty One and they plan to freeze Gotham along with the whole world (they’ve obviously never heard of a little something called: the Sun). Thankfully though, Batman and Robin are here to take care of business, sort of. It’s a wonder they find the time to kick any bad-guy ice, I mean…ass, at all between appearing as guests at ridiculous parties, fighting over Ivy like teen-agers, ice-skating, air-surfing and taking care of a dying Alfred, it’s gotta be hard to keep up! There are so many things wrong with this film I genuinely don’t know where to start. Ok, lets start with the cast I guess. Clooney is wrong, wrong, WRONG as Batman, completely miscast. Granted, no-one would pull off not looking like a dork in that rubber-nippled Batsuit but still, he doesn’t even try, constantly smiling certainly doesn’t help. Arnie has never looked more ridiculous (not even in Junior or Around the World in 80 Days), Uma looks amazing and was brilliantly cast as Ivy but the terrible, terrible lines she’s been given make it impossible for her not to overact her little green-butt off. As for Chris O’Donnell, he’s finally reached the level of stupidity which the Robin of the old 60s TV series had long achieved and perfected, which is a shame because in Forever he did a decent job as the Bat’s sidekick. And as for Alicia Silverstone, she does her best but there are probably hundreds of actresses who would have done much better. Joel Schumacher, once a respectable director (after all, he did do Falling Down), is embarrassingly catastrophic in his directing here and he manages to mix mindlessly clunky fight scenes, shamelessly camp (and just plain bad) performances, fake-looking special effects, plot-holes, neon lights and bright colours EVERYWHERE, laughable costumes, brainless editing, a tiresome score, a preposterous story, pointless subplots…to create a film which is not only cringe-worthy and unintentionally hilarious but insulting to anyone’s intelligence and almost fatal to the coolest comic-book franchise there was. At least forever retained some darkness, some style. All of this is lost here. Instead we have cheesy one-liners agogo courtesy of Arnold including “cool party!”, “the ice man cometh!”, “freeze in hell!”, “time to kick ice!” and my personal favourite: “you’re not sending me to the cooler!”. We can laugh about it now because we have Batman Begins to reassure us that the Bat is back but Batman & Robin still remains a blindingly bad and ludicrous creation. But if you want to laugh, this is the film to watch, trust me, if the dialogs don’t make you snigger then the costumes will. The star and a half goes to Uma for sheer sexiness, Pat Hingle for doing his best as Alfred and Arnold for his “cooooool” shiny contacts. A disastrous yet hilarious debacle.

 

Overall: *1/2 /5

 

   The Matrix (1999)

 

With: Keanu Reeves, Carrie-Anne Moss, Hugo Weaving, Laurence Fishburne

 

 

What is the Matrix? Well, by now everybody knows of course (except perhaps Keanu Reeves whom, I suspect, is still confused about the whole thing), but when the film came out, everyone was puzzled by the enigmatic posters with had weird green letters scrolling down over a black background. Then the trailer came out and the film became a must-see. Do I really need to remind you of what it’s about? Ok then. Thomas A. Anderson lives a double life: by day he works in a tiny cubicle, for a big software company and by night he’s a computer hacker called Neo. Neo has been trying to find out what is the Matrix and has been contacted by a certain Trinity who tells him that a mysterious man by the name of Morpheus wants to meet him. But some creepy Agents seem to be aware of what’s going on and try to make Mr Anderson tell them all he knows. Neo is soon told, after having agreed to see what the Matrix is and ingested a suspicious red pill, that he’s been living in a dream world all his life and that reality is in fact much more disturbing. It seems that the real world is dominated by insect(and squid)-like machines and that the Matrix is nothing but a fake reality, a computer program, a prison for the mind that keeps human beings controlled so they can be used by the machines as energy. It sounds a bit silly doesn’t it, I mean, when you think about it? But it really isn’t because the film asks interesting and mind-bending philosophical questions (Plato and Baudrillard being the main inspirations) that had never been asked in films before. The special effects used in the film and the “bullet-time” technique are mind blowing and audiences were more than impressed. Keanu’s acting is a bit less wooden than usual and Hugo Weaving’s wonderful Agent Smith steals the show. It was obviously inspired by Japanese mangas like Ghost In The Shell (big time) and comic books. And it is, without a doubt, one of the best science-fiction films ever made and definitely incomparable to its 2 lesser sequels. 

 

Overall: *****/5

 

X-Men (2000)

 

With: Hugh Jackman, Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen, Famke Janssen, James Marsden, Halle Berry

 

 

When X-Men begins you know you won’t be getting camp superheroes in yellow spandex and underwear over their tights. The powerful first scene, which shows a young Eric Lencher (Magneto) displaying his metal-controlling power for the first time in a Nazi concentration camp, where he is separated from his parents, starts the film with a dramatic kick in the nuts for those expecting a lightweight adaptation of the popular Marvel comic-books. The introduction of the characters, from the tough, self-healing Wolverine to the rather fragile but extremely powerful Rogue is well handled. And unlike the 3rd instalment of the X-Men films, the new characters aren’t thrown in our faces like confettis. The story is pretty straight-forward, the world is faced with a new kind of people: mutants. These mutants, who possess different powers, are not yet accepted by society and they are feared by most humans. A bitter Magneto believes they should accept that they represent in fact the next stage in evolution and that’s a cause he’s most definitely willing to kill for. The leader of the X-Men, Professor Charles Xavier (a perfectly cast Patrick Stewart), however, believes that a more diplomatic approach is necessary and that bringing the humans to their knees is not the answer. He has faith in humans and feels that one day they will understand and accept mutants. Pretty soon, Magneto exposes his evil plan and it’s up to the X-Men team to face him and save the world. In the team we also have Storm, who controls the weather, Cyclops, capable of shooting powerful plasma rays form his eyes and Jean Grey, a telepath with the ability to control things with her mind.  Bryan Singer (The Usual Suspects) may not seem like the perfect choice to direct such a film, after all, he didn’t know the X-Men comic-books before signing on to do it. But one can’t deny he’s pulled it off and created a strong, serious, fun, action-packed X-Men film. Sure it has its flaws, most of them instantly visible to those familiar with the comics. Characters like Iceman and Storm are missed opportunities and are sidelined as well as misinterpreted, this is also the case in the equally good sequel. Thankfully, the casting is pretty much flawless, with Hugh Jackman brilliant as Wolverine, James Marsden perfect as Cyclops and Ian McKellen suitably evil as Magneto. The special effects have their moments but do look occasionally dated already, which is not a good sign. Having said that, this is a very entertaining, well acted, stylish and clever film worthy of the X-Men which can stand proudly next to Sam Raimi’s Spiderman. Marvel-lous fun.

 

Overall: ****/5

 

Vanilla Sky (2001)

 

With: Tom Cruise, Penelope Cruz, Cameron Diaz, Kurt Russell, Jason Lee

 

 

Cameron Crowe, who brought us such hits as Jerry Maguire, Almost Famous and Say Anything, directs this underrated film, a close remake of Amenabar’s Spanish film Abre Los Ojos (with Penelope Cruz too). It stars Tom Cruise as David Aames, a pretentious, obnoxious millionaire who inherited his late father’s fortune and is consequently the owner of 2 magazines. David has everything: money, looks and an on/off beautiful girlfriend called Julie Gianni (Diaz) whom he treats cruelly without any regards for her feelings. One day, during a party, his friend brings a girl, Sophia (Cruz), and David falls instantly in love with her. And just when we feel David might change his ways, Julie appears in her car and tells him to get in: big mistake. Julie, consumed by jealousy, tells David she loves him just before driving them both off a bridge. She is killed in the crash (or is she?) but David survives, problem is, he is left horribly disfigured (or is he?). As David tries to cope with his unfortunate physical appearance (he has to wear a mask and Sophia is uncomfortable with whom he’s become), his life is going down the drain: he loses Sophia, his friend, Julie appears unexpectedly and haunts his mind and he is arrested for the murder of Sophia. A psychiatrist (Russell) is going to try and help David  remember what exactly happened. Basically, during the whole film, we see what David sees, which makes it hard for us to understand what’s real and what’s not, since David becomes increasingly confused with what’s happening to him. Cameron Crowe, it must be said, has stayed very close to the original Abre Los Ojos but has brought some welcome alterations. The special effects are obviously better, Tom Cruise is as good as ever and perfect for the role and the whole thing is visually amazing. Also, Crowe has added an Oscar-winning soundtrack as well as a slightly different, more explicit (but still enigmatic) ending. The film received mixed reviews and people either loved it or hated it. But Vanilla Sky is ultimately definitely an underrated, misunderstood, haunting little masterpiece and every time you watch it you notice something different. The first scene is a particularly unforgettable and brilliant dream sequence that sees Tom Cruise running in an empty Times Square. The original Spanish version is also highly recommended and is surprisingly just as good as this American one.

 

Overall: *****/5   

Equilibrium (2002)

 

With: Christian Bale, Emily Watson, Taye Diggs, Angus McFadyen, Sean Bean

 

 

This science-fiction B-movie did surprisingly very well at the British box-office when it came out. The futuristic film takes place after the end of a Third World War, the world is under reconstruction and a new system of society has been installed in which people, in order to avoid the appearance of more wars, constantly take a drug that makes them devoid of any feelings. If someone is suspected of feeling or is found carrying objects that could provoke a certain emotional response, he is arrested and often executed (usually by combustion). Everyone acts the same and everyone is ruled by a Big Brother-like leader. The story takes place in a state called Libria and the system in place is an almost religious one. We follow Clerick John Preston, a professional government agent in charge of destroying those who resist the rules, even his best friend and fellow agent. Clerick starts to question his loyalty to the system after he fails to take the drugs one day and starts to feel again, progressively. The film contains some pretty neat action sequences and the invention of a new form of fighting: Gun-Kata, which is basically a mix between martial arts and gun-fighting ( in other words, a combination of Eastern and Western fighting styles). This creation is quite cool and is, unfortunately, one of the only original ideas in this movie. The film was obviously inspired by 1984 (the leader’s face on screens all over town), The Matrix (clothes, fight scenes), Fahrenheit 451 (cityscapes) and even Blade Runner (empathy tests, emotionless beings). The film does suffer from a lack of any real innovative originality but it looks great, Christian Bale is excellent (as usual), the action scenes rock and it’s also quite funny at times (unintentionally, of course). It’s all very stylish and has some impressive special effects and interesting twists. Overall, it’s a very enjoyable science-fiction flick that’s way above SF films like Matrix Revolutions or Paycheck. Great fun.

 

Overall: ***1/2 / 5

 

 

  The League of Extroardinary Gentlemen (2003)

 
With: Sean Connery, Stuart Townsend, Reta Wilson

Famed adventurer Allan Quartermain (Connery) is recruited by the mysterious British Intelligence agent M, who wants him to head a secret mission to save the world. M has assemled a team to help Quatermain including Dr Jekyll/MrHyde, Dorian Gray, the Invisible Man, Captain Nemo, Tom Sawyer and Mina Harker. They must work together to stop the Fantom and his plot for world domination. It's brainless, silly, at times weak and confusing but, overall, quite entertaining and fun. Ignore the crappy script and, to quote Allan Quartermain: "I'm shtill waiting to be impreshed!"

 
Overall: **1/2 /5
 

Minority Report (2002)

 

With: Tom Cruise, Max Von Sydow, Samantha Morton, Colin Farrell

 

 

Steven Spielberg directs this brilliant science fiction film based on a Philip K. Dick short story. Tom Cruise is John Anderton, a troubled cop who’s a great believer in the Precrime system in place in Washington DC (the film is set in 2054). This system is based on the visions of 3 beings, Precogs, who are able to see crimes and murders before they actually happen. The police is then able, from watching the images created by the Precogs’ minds, to stop these crimes before their occurrence. But before this revolutionary and (supposedly perfect) system can go national, Lamar Burgess, co-creator of Precrime, has to prove that it is completely flawless. Then, one day, John Anderton, whilst working on a new vision by the Precogs, discovers that he himself is going to commit a murder in the near future. He has never met the victim before and has no choice but to escape and try to prove his innocence. Which turns out to be a really hard thing to accomplish indeed! The film is visually flawless and impressive with some exciting action-sequences. Cruise is as good as ever and his performance is a powerful one. Samantha Morton is also absolutely brilliant as the Precog Agatha. John Williams provides an energetic score which adds tension and punch to the sequences. There are many twists and turns in a complex and clever story that demands repeat viewings. Spielberg, with A.I., showed that he wanted to go in a new direction: cyberpunk. Minority Report is arguably one of his best films and is definitely underrated as it is, in my opinion, one of the best sci-fi films of the 21th century so far. Overall, this is an inventive, thought-provoking, perfectly acted, written and directed, thrilling ride that’s a real treat for all science-fiction lovers. Wrongly overlooked by the Oscars as well, tsss.

 

Overall: *****/5

 

Daredevil (2003)

 

With: Ben Affleck, Jennifer Garner, Colin Farrell, Michael Clarke Duncan, Joe Pantoliano

 

 

After the huge success of Spiderman, a darker, less popular Marvel superhero had he’s movie debut: Daredevil. When the film begins, we know it’s not going to be a light-hearted affair: we see our hero, perched on top of a church, bleeding to death in the night. What follows is his long-ish back story. As a kid, Matt Murdock is bullied and his father, an ex boxer known as Jack ‘The Devil’ Murdock, is a troubled man who drinks and remembers his past victories with great nostalgia. Nevertheless, Matt promises his dad that he will not follow in his footsteps and that he will work hard at school. Some time later, Matt is deceived when he realises his father is working for criminals and he has an accident that leaves him blind forever. However, his other senses have become incredibly sensible, Matt can hear the slightest sound, smell the faintest odour and simply by knocking on a surface, this creates a sort of radar effect which allows him to see a bit and keep his balance. So, Matt works hard and learns to fight, as his strength and agility has increased as well. But, when his father fails to go down in the ring as he was told to, he is murdered by a certain Kingpin of crime and Matt is left all alone and wanting revenge. From then on, he will help those for whom justice has not been fair to and punish those who abuse others. Matt becomes a lawyer by day and a rather violent vigilante by night. As Matt, his power is limited, as Daredevil, his ways are confused. When a child thinks he is the bad guy one night he was fighting a thug, he knows he has to change. Ben Affleck does very well as one of the darkest Marvel heroes there is and Jennifer Garner is great, not to mention stunning, as Elektra. Michael Clarke Duncan’s Kingpin is not very faithful to the one of the comic-books but he is terrific anyway. It’s Farrell who steals the show though, as Irish villain Bullseye, who has the ability to be extremely accurate when throwing things. There are also some cool cameos to spot: Kevin Smith, Sam Lee and Frank Miller. There’s much to like in this film and it’s been wrongly underrated in my opinion. Daredevil is very entertaining and ambitious in its execution. The special effects are not always 100% but that’s not too dramatic. Admittedly, there are a few glitches and clumsy bits and pieces in the film but overall, this is a fine introduction to a darker, more aggressive hero. Not as good as Spiderman but not bad at all. A sequel should help to clean up a few of the minor flaws.

 

Overall: ***1/2 /5

 

Cypher (2003)

 

With: Jeremy Northam, Lucy Liu

            

 

This little known science-fiction spy film was directed by Vicenzo Natali, who made cult film Cube. It’s one of the best and most clever science-fiction films of the past 5 years. It’s the story of geeky Morgan Sullivan, a normal married man who lives in the suburbs, who decides to become a spy for a shady corporation. He is given a new identity, Jack Thursby, and is sent to countless boring conventions and is given a transmitter to record them. It’s clear from the very start that something screwy is going on. As Morgan progressively changes personality and becomes Jack Thursby, he meets a beautiful and mysterious woman who tells him that everything is not what it seems to be. The film is neatly directed and has a Spielberg feel to it in that it’s almost shot in monochrome and is very stylish. The story is absorbing once you get into it and could almost be a Philip K. Dick story in that twist follows twist and manages to surprise you constantly. Jeremy Northam’s American accent is flawless and he is surprisingly good. The film also has an excellent score and a sense of humour which makes the complex plot easier to absorb. It may not be as good as Minority Report or Gattaca but it’s certainly better than any of the Matrix sequels and I, Robot. Overall, Cypher is an underrated and fascinating little gem that might become a cult film with time. A must-see for all science-fiction fans.

 

Overall: ****/5

I, Robot (2004)

With: Will Smith and Alan Tudyk

After the Matrix "debacle", I feared the extinction of clever science-fiction films but I,Robot proved me wrong. Directed by Alex Proyas, well known for his ambitious, impressive cult classic Dark City, I, Robot was one of the biggest summer blockbusters of 2004 (a disappointingly low on blockbusters year). Will Smith is slightly miscast as the troubled detective Spooner, it must be said. He fails to eradicate his tiresome "Fresh Prince" persona. Thereore, it is Alan Tudyk who easily steals the show as the robot murder suspect. This film is not only very entertaining but it is also a tense and intelligent detective story. From Isaac Asimov, the writer of the cheese-fest and unbearably overlong Bicentinnial Man comes a truly fascinating and well directed sci-fi film that looks good and feels good.

Overall:***1/2 /5 

Spiderman 2 (2004)

 

With: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, Alfred Molina, James Franco, Rosemary Harris, Donna Murphy

 

 

Spiderman returned in 2004 with an equally entertaining and impressive sequel directed, once again, by Sam Raimi. From the start, it seems Peter Parker is not doing too well and is finding it hard to handle all his “lives”. He has a lousy job as a pizza delivery boy but is always late because of his “Spidey duties”, actually, he gets fired  very early on in the film. Not only that but he’s not working as well as he should at college since he’s always tired and can’t concentrate. And to top it off, he lives in a crappy little apartment, he’s behind on the rent and the newspapers are still against Spiderman. Oh yeah, and he’s still in love with Mary Jane (Dunst) who’s actually doing pretty well for herself as an actress. Things go from bad to worse as a friendly scientist, Doctor Octavius (Molina) is turned into a powerful villain nicknamed Dr Octopus, aka Doc Ock after an experiment goes horribly wrong. Poor Octavius not only loses his wife but the metallic tentacles which were attached to his spine for the experiment, start to control his every thought. Meanwhile, Harry Osborn, son of Norman, aka the Green Goblin, is still far from forgiving Spiderman for killing his “beloved” dad and he just gets angrier and drunker as the film progresses. Aunt May has problems of her own too, financial ones mostly: she doesn’t have enough money to pay for the house anymore and she misses her late husband Ben, who died in the first film. As you can see, all this is very stressful for our friendly neighbourhood Spiderman and the stress in question has become so important that Peter is losing his powers as a cause of it. Which is always a bit annoying, especially when you know an unhinged madman is preparing a dangerous machine capable of destroying the entire city. In this sequel, Sam Raimi’s stylish, tongue-in-cheek style is more perceptible, especially in the inspired, Evil Dead-ish scene where Octopus’ tentacles come alive and brutally annihilate a bunch of doctors. There’s even a little chainsaw involved, and later, “The Chin” himself, Bruce Campbell does another cameo appearance. Some scenes however are too funny, too tongue-in-cheek and I found myself expecting Leslie Nielsen to pop up at some points (especially during the out of place Butch Cassidy spoof bit). Sure Spiderman is light-hearted and fun but not buffoon-esque for crying out loud, calm down Sam. Another problem with this film is the rhythm, there’s far too much emphasis on the M.J. and Peter relationship and the romantic scenes are overlong and just seem to slow down the film’s rhythm. Having said that, those are the only bad points of Spiderman 2. The special effects are still impressive even though the “surprise” factor of the first film is gone. There’s a much better villain (with a decent costume this time) in the shape of Molina’s excellent Dr Octopus. Otherwise, the story is great and … is completely perfect as Jameson. Overall, Spiderman 2 is just as good as its predecessor: it’s bigger, funnier and contains some truly gripping action sequences (the train, the bank). Sam Raimi hasn’t produced a 5 stars-worthy Spiderman film yet but maybe it will come one day, and anyway, I’m not complaining as the 2 Spiderman films  he’s done so far are very admirable indeed.

 

Overall: ****/5

 

Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events (2004)

With: Jim Carrey, Meryl Streep, Jude Law, Timothy Spall, Billy Connolly, Liam Aiken

Based on the first 3 volumes of Lemony Snicket’s dark children’s books. A Series Of Unfortunate Events has been compared with Harry Potter but to be honest, it’s a bit of a lazy comparison as they don’t have anything in common except for the fact that they’re for children and have a certain darkness about them. The film’s opening sequence is inspired and sets the mood for the film: it refuses to be a happy little story about a happy little elf with a happy little ending. Instead, this is the dark, gothic and gruesomely funny story of the 3 Baudelaire orphans (Violet, Klaus and Sunny) who lost their parents in a suspicious fire which also burnt down their home to a crisp. They are sent to live with their distant relative Count Olaf: a talentless actor who lives in a big, gloomy house. From the moment the 3 children meet the Count it is very clear what he’s after: the fortune they inherited from their parents. After Olaf’s dastardly plan to get the kids run over by an oncoming train fails, the 3 poor children are sent to live with other relatives: the friendly herpetologist Uncle Monty (Connelly) and the frightened Aunt Josephine (Streep). But they have not seen the last of Olaf who will do anything to get his hands on the fortune, including wearing countless disguises and even committing murder. After his great against-type performance in Eternal sunshine, Jim Carrey is back to his old rubber-face tricks to end the year with a bang. Jim Carrey’s Count Olaf is, however, a much more likeable and loud character than Lemony Snicket’s creation: in the book, you wouldn’t find the evil Olaf imitating a dinosaur that’s for sure. Jim is obviously very funny throughout but maybe his rubber-faced craziness should have been more toned down for the role of Olaf. Still, he has his creepy moments and he assumes 3 different disguises during the film: Olaf, Stefano (Uncle Monty’s assistant) and an old sailor who manages to "charm" Aunt Josephine, an absolutely excellent Meryl Streep who has lots of fun with her character. As for the rest of the cast, the main children do a very good job although Liam Aiken, as Klaus, should try and smile once in a while, since when is Klaus a grumpy little brat? Brad Silberling’s direction and the cinematography are delightful and very stylish (Tim Burton-esque, even). Think Addams Family, Edward Scissorhands and Harry Potter all rolled into one. The sets are huge and give the film a surreal quality, as for the costumes, they’re all spot-on. Overall, A Series of Unfortunate Events is an entertaining, funny and visually beautiful film that will delight kids and adults alike, anyone with a dark side will enjoy this thoroughly.

Overall: ***1/5 /5

 

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (2005)

 

With: Martin Freeman, Zooey Deschanel, Mos Def, Sam Rockwell, Bill Nighy, John Malkovitch, Anna Chancellor

 

 

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy has been a radio show, a novel (by Douglas Adams) and a TV show, so it was inevitable that it would eventually become a film. The cult show has a acquired numerous fans over the years and it looks that they won’t be disappointed with this fine adaptation. It’s basically the story of regular guy Arthur who is saved by his odd friend Ford (not from Earth) who managed to hitch a ride on a spaceship seconds before the Earth’s total destruction by some very unhandsome aliens. But DON’T PANIC! Earth is fine, it’s all fictional. Arthur is thus introduced to the big, very big galaxy and its unusual inhabitants and creations. Soon, Arthur meets some wonderfully weird characters such as Zaphod, the President of the Universe who has 2 faces and without one of them he becomes as dumb as a sheep with brain damage. Not to mention the depressed robot Marvin who steals the show whenever it appears. Everyone is delightfully over the top without being heavy although there is a bit of a lack of Malkovitch, oh well. These days, British cinema hasn’t been at its best, I mean, when your best film of the year is Shaun of the Dead, you know there’s a problem. Here’s a British film that’s actually funny and witty as well as impressive and great to look at. The special effects are excellent and there are some neat stylish moments provided by first-time director Garth Jennings (who did commercials and music videos). The whole thing is very British and eccentric, think Monty Python meets Star Wars meets Brazil. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy is definitely my favourite British film in recent years, Shaun of the Dead?? Don’t make me laugh! 

 

Overall: ****/5

 

 

Star Wars: Episode III: The Revenge of the Sith (2005)

 

With: Hayden Christensen, Ewan McGregor, Ian McDiarmid Natalie Portman, Samuel L. Jackson, Frank Oz

 

 

Yes, this is it: the final Star Wars film. After 28 years, George Lucas’ epic sci-fi fantasy saga comes to an end. Episodes I and II were somewhat disappointing. Both told interesting stories and brought fantastic special effects, cool villains and were very entertaining indeed. But they were essentially flawed and failed to match the original trilogy’s brilliance. Now we come to Episode III: Anakin Skywalker gradually detaches himself from the Jedi council, his master Obi Wan and even his pregnant wife Padme and forms a friendship with the evil Chancellor (who turns out to be the Sith Lord) who becomes his master and makes Anakin’s transition to the Dark Side complete. Anyone familiar with the previous Star Wars films knows what to expect and this includes Darth Vador’s long awaited return. I’m glad to say that Episode III is, without a shadow of a doubt, superior to its 2 predecessors: it’s darker, more impressive, clever and George Lucas ultimately does a surprisingly great job at tying the ends of the 2 narrative ropes together. I can’t claim that I’m personally a humongous fan of the Star Wars saga but I must admit that I thoroughly enjoyed this film and was pleasantly surprised, which is a good thing since I haven’t managed to sit through Episode I till the end yet and was left a bit sceptical after the slightly better Episode II. Episode III may be the best Star Wars prequel but it is not perfect and isn’t without its shortcomings. There are a few cringe-worthy bad jokes and geeky one-liners which made me roll my eyes more than once (and what’s with those droids with the silly squeaky voices?). I must also mention the clumsily written and acted romantic story (the big problem of Episode II) but thankfully, we don’t get a lot of that in this one. Hayden Christensen’s acting is still very wooden but, to be fair, he has improved since Episode II, in which he was just plain incredibly bad and deserved his Razzie nomination. Here, he does his best and proves he can, at least, act evil. Natalie Portman is, well, annoying, but it mustn’t be easy, I’m sure, to be the only girl in this whole story! Ewan McGregor is, however, quite good as Obi Wan, Samuel L. Jackson emanates coolness even in the way he walks, Frank Oz is as good as ever as the voice of Yoda (who, once again, steals the show) and McDiarmid is brilliant as the evil Sith Lord. Everyone kicks butt, even R2D2, who usually just said ‘blip’ repetitively. Overall, it rocks, and Star Wars fans finally have a prequel to be proud of. Darth’s brief return is well and truly welcome and the Force was obviously with George Lucas when he made the film. Terrific fun, this film is. Nerds rejoice!

 

Overall: ****/5 

 

 

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005)

 

With: Johnny Depp, Freddie Highmore, Christopher Lee, Helena Bonham Carter

 

 

The original adaptation of Roald Dahl’s famous children’s book is now seen by some as a flawed, overly positive, unfaithful adaptation and by others as an underrated cult classic. And since I’m of the latter group, I was undoubtedly excited about the great Tim Burton making another adaptation of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. The casting of Johnny Depp as the weirdest chocolatier ever, Mr Willy Wonka, was obviously very promising as he hasn’t disappointed in any of his past collaborations with Burton (Edward Scissorhands, Ed Wood, Sleepy Hollow). Incarnating young Charlie is Depp’s co-star of Finding Neverland Freddie Highmore, who gives another impressive performance and was definitely a good choice. The rest of the cast includes Helena Bonham Carter as Charlie’s mum and the creepy Christopher Lee as Willy Wonka’s dentist father. From the  amazing opening titles you just know Tim Burton has got his magic touch back. Not that he had really lost it but since Mars Attacks! he hadn’t produced a film worthy of his past masterpieces…until now that is. From the offset, all his best trademarks are at the rendez-vous: Snow? Check. Danny Elfman score? Check. Spirals agogo? Check. Strangely futuristic machinery operating? Check. This version is a considerably darker, more twisted one than the original musical Gene Wilder version. First, Wonka himself: Gene Wilder gave a brilliant performance in the original but he was criticised by some because he wasn’t “weird” or “creepy” enough. Well, they won’t be saying that about Depp’s Wonka that’s for sure. This one is a twisted mixture of Ed Wood and Pee-Wee Herman with a dash of Michael Jackson. The Willy Wonka we’re given is one with a troubled childhood, a constant creepy smile, impossible hair and an undescribable voice: he’s camp, he’s clumsy, he’s disturbing, he’s hilarious. The film itself is definitely a more faithful adaptation even though Burton does add a lot of his own ideas (we discover Wonka’s dad) and the ending is much more satisfying than the overly sentimental one of the original. And what about the Oompa Loompas? Well, you remember the old ones? Basically dwarves with bright orange face-paint, silly clown clothes and green hair. Well, now the Oompas are a sort of Indian-ish tribe of what can only be described as clones. And even though their new songs aren’t quite as memorable as the classic Oompa Loompa Song, they are very catchy nevertheless and much more energetic. Tim Burton has produced his best film in years and it will delight children and adults alike. Overall, with a brilliant Danny Elfman score, cool special effects, Burton’s unique gothic style and Depp’s delighfully tongue-in-cheek performance, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a near-perfect, must-see gem that will have you grinning for an hour and a half. That is, unless you’re made of stone. 

 

Overall: ****1/2 /5

 

War Of The Worlds (2005)

 

With: Tom Cruise, Dakota Fanning, Tim Robbins

 

 

 

Mr Spielberg has always had a child-like fascination with aliens and UFOs. In E.T., we “encountered” (hehe) the loveable little E.T.: an alien who formed a friendship with some kids and whose main concern was to phone home. Then came the epic Close Encounters of the Third Kind, the film in which Spielberg’s alien-fixation reached its peak. The ‘Berg even managed to squeeze in aliens at the end of A.I. for crying out loud! Sadly though, in this particular case, it screwed up the ending totally, oh well. Now comes War of the Worlds, the new adaptation of H.G. Wells’ sci-fi novel in which Earth is invaded by evil aliens who want to exterminate and take over. So much for the nice and cutesy UFOs then…The original 1953 film is now a classic and the story is obviously a perfect match for Spielberg’s style. Tom Cruise is Ray Ferrier, a deadbeat dad whose ex-wife gives him the kids to take care of during the week-end as she and her new husband head off to Boston. It’s soon very clear that Ray isn’t a very capable dad and it looks like it’ll be a pretty dull week-end for the kids. That’s of course before they witness an unnatural series of strange lightning bolts. After that, the electricity gets cut off, cars come to a halt, watches stop. Oh yeah, and a Half-Life-style giant tripod appears out of the ground and creates havoc by destroying buildings and people thanks to some nifty laser-beams. Ray will have to go back home, find the kids and get them out of there as quickly as possible. We thus follow this little family (Ray, Dakota Fanning’s cute little Rachel and Justin Chatwin’s teenager Robbie) as they try to escape and avoid being reduced to ashes. Unlike the slow-burning Close Encounters, War of the Worlds is quite fast-paced, when the action sequences kick in, they kick ass, major ass. Spielberg is back doing what he does best: making incredible blockbusters with a mix of jaw-dropping effects and moving drama. The drama in question is cleverly written and avoids most cliches, we feel like we’re part of that family, we witness the invasion the same time as they do. This is not Independence Day (argh) or Armageddon (bouargh): overblown productions in which we see Paris, Tokyo and london getting wiped out one by one and 1 man implausibly saves the whole bloody world without breaking a sweat. No, here, Ray is not concerned with saving the world, he knows that’s impossible to achieve, his goal is to protect his family. Ray is terrified but knows he cannot give up. The original film was very general but this is more focused, we’re not told all the details of the invasion, we don’t know what’s happening in France or Tokyo. Cruise is as good as ever and the young Fanning is impressive as Rachel. The rest of the cast is great too, especially Tim Robbins as a creepy guy who gives the family shelter. Overall, this is Spielberg’s best film since Minority Report and even though the aliens themselves are a bit conventionnal (Spielberg’s obviously read Stephen King’s Dreamcatcher), the last 30 minutes are slower-paced and ends abruptly, War of the Worlds is still a thrilling, ass-kicking sci-fi film that’s at times touching, funny, terrifying, nail-biting and simply amazing to look at. Unmissable.

 

Overall: ****1/2 /5      

 

 

Lady in the Water (2006)

 

With: Paul Giamatti, Bryce Dallas Howard, M. Night Shyamalan

 

 

After ghosts, aliens, superheroes and weird Amish-type people, director M. Night Shyamalan now turns to bedtime stories to bring us sea-nymphs, wolf-like creatures and even scary monkeys! Lady in the Water is the simple little story of a lonely, stuttering motel owner called Cleveland who, one night, finds a Narf (sea-nymph) in his pool. Without revealing too much of the plot so as not to ruin it for you, all I can say is that Cleveland is going to have to find a way, perhaps with the help of the colourful occupants of the motel, to get Story, the Narf, home without getting eaten by any creepy monsters. As with the underrated Unbreakable and The Village, Night’s previous film, it takes a bit of time to truly get into the film, but once you do you’ll be hooked till the very end and when the end credits roll you’ll want to see the whole thing all over again. That is, if you allow yourself to enter M. Night Shyamalan’s dark, complex and mysterious world. Shyamalan is a director who likes to take risks, he makes the films he wants to see and that’s it, in Unbreakable, he took his time and told his obscure yet incredibly clever superhero story slowly and without the need for over-the-top special effects. In The Village he turned the whole film on its head and gave us a truly audience-dividing twist. And now, he gives us a fantastical tale like Lady in the Water, a PG-rated tale which kids will, first of all, not really understand and, second of all, find pretty scary. The rest of us will find lots to enjoy though, if we can be patient viewers and give the Night in shining armour a chance to tell his original bedtime story. Paul Giamatti is unsurprisingly terrific as Cleveland and Bryce Dallas Howard is more than perfect as the beautiful, fragile, pure and angelic Story. The rest of the cast is spot-on, with Bob Balaban excellent as an arrogant film reviewer and Shyamalan himself doing surprisingly well in a more lengthy appearance this time. Lady in the Water will perhaps lose some of its less patient viewers but admirers of Shyamalan’s stylish, slow-paced, poetic ways will embrace the story-telling techniques and will ultimately find themselves charmed by it all. Overall, a magical little gem with truly beautiful moments, strong performances and one of the best directors around at his most inventive and daring. Charming and haunting.

 

Overall: ****/5 

 

Superman Returns (2006)
 
With: Brandon Routh, Kevin Spacey, Kate Bosworth, James Marsden
 

 

After abandonning the X-Men 3 set and leaving us with a fatally messy and shallow sequel courtesy of Brett Ratner, Bryan Singer went off to the DC side to cook up the next Superman movie. A lot of pressure was on him and there have been mixed reviews so far but as far as I’m concerned he’s definitely pulled it off. Superman Returns is the proof that Singer is now very comfortable in the comic-book film genre, Superman is his graduation as a director of superhero movies. He can now finally join Tim Burton and Sam Raimi in the pantheon of great comic book movies directors, Robert Rodriguez should follow relatively soon. Superman Returns takes place pretty much after Superman II, with the Man of Steel returning from a 5 year long trip during which Kal-El tried to find the remains of his home planet Krypton and left Earth to mend its wounds. All is definitely not well upon his arrival, not only has crime risen dramatically and wars have broken out everywhere but his old nemesis Lex Luthor is out of jail, free to prepare a new scheme, and, to top it all, Lois Lane has a child and is taken by Cyclops! Grrr. Feeling more alone than ever, Superman will have to put his personal feelings and desires aside to save the world from certain mutilation. Casting an unknown to play the iconic superhero might have raised a few eyebrows but Brandon Routh does well considering he had a mountain of pressure to overcome. Sure his Clark Kent is nowhere near as geeky as he should be and he fails to outdo the late, great Christopher Reeves as Superman. Having said that, he gives a more than worthy performance and adds a certain insecurity and even a slight vulnerability to the Superman character who, even though he is from another planet and has cool powers, spent his whole life on Earth and has feelings like every human he protects, why should he be so confident all the time anyway? As for Kevin Spacey, he’s obviously perfect as Lex Luthor and is arguably way more satisfying as Luthor than Gene Hackman who was always more slimy than evil. Spacey’s villain is crueller and more megalomaniac than ever, plus he adds a welcome comic touch to the proceedings and thankfully manages to avoid being a complete clown like the old Luthor often was. Kate Bosworth is certainly a different Lois Lane, for one thing, she’s actually pretty! And not in a bimbo kind of way. You can actually understand now what Superman sees in her. Good news is, Bosworth’s Lane is not just a pretty face, she’s perfectly cocky and driven not to mention smart, as she should be. Whereas the old Lois was overly mouthy, average-looking, borderline annoying and unconvincingly clever, this is the Lois Superman deserves. She feels less like a caricature and more real as a character. As for the story, well, even though the reason for Superman’s absence is a bit rushed and the whole crystal in water thing slightly under-explained, none of this matters as Superman stories were always pretty preposterous in essence and this one is far from being the most far-fetched out there, and it’s all so entertaining and gripping you’ll buy every bit of it if you let yourself enter this delightfully colourful comic-book world. This is a daring Superman film that’s not afraid to have its dark moments (cannibal dogs anyone?), have fun (note the wonderful Big reference) and have a surprisingly long running time (2h30). The critics can say what they want but Superman Returns is probably the best Superman film so far and is definitely the best blockbuster of the summer, splashing the Pirates out of the water. Superman Returns is visually impressive, funny, moving, dark, stylish, exciting and its flaws are so mild that they deserve to be forgiven. The last 10-15 minutes feel a bit long, big deal. I wasn’t bored one second. Superman Returns, and it’s about time as well! A real treat for the senses.

 

Overall: ****1/2 /5 

Epic/ Fantasy

Conan the Barbarian (1982)

 

With: Arnold Schwarzenegger, James Earl Jones, Max Von Sydow

 

 

This is one of Arnold’s first proper films. Of course, the first one was Hercules in New York, undoubtedly one of the worst films ever made. This, however, is a respectable and much more decent effort that propelled The Schwarz to super-stardom. Conan the Barbarian is an adaptation of a book by E.P. Howard (it’s also, more famously, a comic-book). It tells the story of a young boy, Conan who sees his village burned to the ground and both his parents brutally murdered in front of him by some evil snake-loving bad guys. The boy is captured and becomes a slave, as the years pass, the boy becomes a man: Arnie! Obviously, we know what happens next: Conan is going to search for his people’s ruthless killers and get revenge. Along his way, Conan meets some strange characters and gets into some adventures filled with sorcery and violence. There’s also an excellent villain in the form of the evil Thulsa Doom. The whole thing, admittedly, is pretty brainless and there are numerous silly moments, but it’s all so entertaining and so much fun you barely notice it and enjoy the ride. Achnold’s performance is, well, mediocre, as always. But Conan is a barbarian at the end of the day, not a neurotic art-lover from Manhattan! And Schwarzy provides just what the character needs: muscles. Actually, his performance is one of his best believe it or not. What makes this film worth seeing is its originality: the costumes, settings and designs are impressive and the directing is surprisingly good. I must also mention the music for this film contains one of the best and most energetic film scores you’re ever likely to hear. Overall, Conan the Barbarian is an underrated terrific epic fantasy that’s unforgettable and great fun. And to those ignorant reviewers who said it was a ‘thumpingly stupid’ film I say this: I will crush my enemies, see them driven before me and hear the lamentations of their women! Aaarghaaarghh!

 

Overall: ****/5

 

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002)

 

With: Elijah Wood, Andy Serkis, Ian McKellen, Sean Astin, Viggo Mortensen, Orlando Bloom, Hugo Weaving, Liv Tyler

 

 

The second part of the biggest film trilogy ever is a much darker affair than its predecessor and things really start to take off in this one. Whereas The Fellowship of the Ring was all about introducing the characters, Middle Earth, the story and the formation of the fellowship, The Two Towers wastes no time on all that: we all know the characters by now (except of course for Gollum), the fellowship is broken and we now get to see how everyone handles things when separated from the group. Frodo and Sam are still trying to find the way to the black gates of Mordor but they are lost, until they encounter the snaky, mysterious Gollum, an old owner of the One Ring. When the hobbits first encounter the creepy little monster, he attacks them and tries to get the “precious” from them. But he is beaten and becomes their guide, Sam doesn’t trust him one second but Frodo seems to have developed a certain bond with Gollum’s considerably friendlier alter-ego Smeagol. Meanwhile, Legolas, Aragorn and Gimli are following the tracks of the 2 other hobbits Merry and Pippin who were captured by orcs. They soon meet the White Wizard, aka Gandalf The White, who has come back to join the battle after defeating the demon who took him away in the first film. As for Merry and Pippin, they manage to escape the orcs (barely) and find themselves in an old forest where they make friends with the talking tree Treebeard. Some new characters are introduced apart from Gollum: Faramir, who we learn is Boromir’s brother and spends most of the film giving the hobbits a hard time. Wormtongue, a sneaky pawn of Saruman, is also an interesting new character. The Two Towers contains some truly impressive sequences and the last hour or so is particularly action-packed. The schizophrenic Gollum does steal the show though, not only because he is one of the best CGI creation there is (if not the best) but also because Andy Serkis’ performance is excellent, he’s managed to bring to life a rather complex character that’s funny yet tragic and deeply disturbed: Gollum shows Frodo and Sam what happens when you are completely consumed by the “precious” Ring, and it seems Frodo is finding it increasingly hard to carry the burden. Overall, The Two Towers is an epic triumph and a worthy follower of The Fellowship of the Ring, actually, it’s just as good but in a different way. When you get to the end of the second film you feel like the Shire is so far away and start to doubt, much like the hobbits, if you’ll ever see its green fields again. The battle for Middle Earth is about to begin…

 

Overall: *****/5

 

 

Kingdom of Heaven (2005)

 

With: Orlando Bloom, Eva Green, Liam Neeson, Jeremy Irons

 

 

When Ridley Scott made Gladiator he reinvented the epic genre and obviously a whole bunch of epic films followed…and flopped: Arthur, Alexander, Troy…Now, Ridley has returned with yet another film of this kind (maybe to finish what he started?). He takes on the Crusades and we follow Orlando Bloom as a blacksmith who eventually becomes the defender of Jerusalem against Saladin’s army. From the offset it’s clear that Scott hasn’t lost his touch: the film is visually flawless from beginning till end and the battle scenes are certainly impressive. Unfortunately, the casting of Orlando ‘Legolas’ Bloom proves to be a bit of a mistake. Whereas Russell Crowe was convincing as a tough Roman turned gladiator, Bloom is just too young and innocent-looking to be convincing as a blacksmith turned great kick-ass leader. His acting is sadly too wooden and he seems to struggle with the scenes where he has to act ‘tough’. Having said that, admittedly the rest of the cast does very well although Eva Green and Orlando Bloom undoubtedly suffered an overdose of close-ups during the film. The endless brooding poses and absorbed stares into the distance are quite distracting and unnecessary. Through this film, it’s clear that Ridley Scott wants to show that a) not all Muslims are bad and that b) things haven’t changed that much 1000 years later. And if you can forgive the odd cheesy line, this message is put through quite effectively. Kingdom of Heaven is certainly much better than Arthur etc…but it isn’t quite as stunning as Peter Jackson’s The Return of the King for example. Overall, this is a very entertaining and impressive film that lovers of the epic genre will adore. Just don’t expect Gladiator.

 

Overall: ***/5

 

Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man’s Chest (2006)

 

With: Johnny Depp, Orlando Bloom, Bill Nighy, Keira Knightley, Tom Hollander, Jonathan Pryce

 

 

When the first Pirates of the Carribean film came out, it was a surprise hit. Based on a theme park ride, it introduced the best pirate movie in decades, Keira Knightley (thanks a lot!), cool special effects, boat-loads of dark summer fun and of course: Jack Sparrow. Director Gore Verbinski certainly proved he deserved to be respected as an action fantasy director. With a crowd-pleasing Oscar nomination for Johnny Depp and about $654 million in the pocket, it soon spawned not one but two sequels (the final part due for next summer) and gave Disney a reason to live again. Dead Man’s Chest, the first sequel to the Pirates trilogy, starts off quite dramatically with Elizabeth and Will Turner’s wedding interrupted by their sudden arrest. In order to free himself and his beloved, Will must find Jack Sparrow and return a certain compass to the uptight Lord Beckett. Meanwhile, Jack finds himself cursed by Will’s father who tells him Davy Jones is looking for him. The latter turns out to be a creepy pirate with a…squid…beard and a…fishy crew and a…big…squid…thing he can control. Silly? Hell yeah! Fun? Damn right. If you thought the skeletons were bad, wait till you get a load of these creeps. Very soon, it’s clear that this instalment is a bit darker than its predecessor, 10 minutes in we have an eye being poked out by a crow and Jack paddling with a poor soul’s severed bony leg in a casket at night. Oh, and we have a whole bunch of cannibals later on. This is a less-kid friendly and slightly more gothic affair, it’s also a bit long. I must say though, that I wasn’t bored one second. With the confident and impressive action scenes kicking in one after the other with gusto and the excellent special effects and score working their magic, this is non-stop preposterous summer fun. Depp is, as ever, brilliant and his loveable Jack Sparrow offers welcome comic-relief and a bit of rock and roll. Sadly, Orlando Bloom is as bland as ever and his Will Turner still has no real personality, he does well during the action scenes though. As for Keira, the good news is she’s much less annoying than in the first film, um, except for that cringe-worthy bit at the beach, and by the end of the film you’ll still end up hating her guts, oh well. Surprisingly underrated by the critics, this is a very good sequel that will not disappoint fans of the original. It all ends in a cliff-hanger so lets just hope the final part is as good as this one and doesn’t end in a dull Matrix Revolutions-type fiasco. Overall, terrific fun, me hearties, Yahrrrrrr!

 

Overall: ****/5

Be sure to let me know what you hear and I'll add it to this page!